Like many of us, he laments the cancellation of our latest conference. But not without a bit of wit!
While we nurse
our disappointments about Hurricane Sandy forcing the cancellation of the
conference, please keep in mind the true source of this disaster. I blame The Boss.
Yes Bruce Springsteen. Ever since the early 1970s, he has been
crooning from Asbury Park for his elusive Sandy girl, hoping for “carnival
life” with her (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdwwIElfHPE). But she just kept “runnin’ and laughin’,”
always staying out of reach. Until
now. After all that beckoning, she
finally said, You called? Ok, … here I
come!....
While waiting for
Sandy, Springsteen mentioned Madame Marie Castello, whose fortune telling he
liked because “the world has lost enough mystery.”
I have been reading
a marvelous public intellectual book, Kathryn Schulz’s Being Wrong:Adventures in the Margins of Error (2010), which makes no mention of Madame
Castello, fortune telling, or Springsteen.
But Schulz does offer astute descriptions of the role of elusive
uncertainties in our lives. The gap
between the world we expect and often demand, and the messy things that
actually happen is a constant source of our getting things wrong. We generally call these problems, but she
points out that being right is generally static, while being wrong is a source
inspiration for science and the arts, it can be an adventure in diversity,
chance, and exploration, and it is distinctively human. To err is human, while animals and machines
operate with fewer choices or none at all, and the divine, at least in
monotheistic traditions, is never wrong.
Human mistakes point to our distinctiveness, and provide lessons for
self-discovery.
Many would prefer to
think of the world without mystery. My
little story about the New Jersey Boss directing the storm can serve as a
reminder that for all the power of our theories, contingencies still emerge,
outliers happen, and natural forces can surprise. Planning for the conference is a microcosm of
all our imposition of order on life with conveniences, comforts, schedules, and
clock time itself, all recent developments in world history, and even now, even
the most astute intellectuals cannot control all.
There are still more
agents for proposed order, emerging from much popular religion. A significant portion of the public maintains
that there is a much bigger divine boss operating weather systems and all the
world at first hand. There is an eerie
resemblance between the absolutes of religion and the confidence in human
reason and organizing talents: they both attempt to banish mystery. Historians do not need to endorse such
beliefs to reckon with their competing power in a democratic culture, even
while we as a group are particularly aware that contingencies abound.
Beyond awareness of
the world’s capacity to surprise, what can we do about it? I learned recently about a study of
mosquitoes’ capacity to fly during rain storms, since each raindrop is to them
like a boulder that could crush them.
They don’t avoid the dangers; they ride them. Mosquitoes take constant brief trips on drops
as those dangers come at them. They turn
the problems into opportunities.
So, my fellow
historians, is there a way to turn this problem, this canceled conference,
created by Springsteen or not, into an opportunity?—beyond the opportunities
that emerged when we all just gained a weekend…. Perhaps we can have an exchange of papers
with commentary on the blog; or if there is a future meeting, when there will
likely be plenty of gaps in attendance, we could have panel chairs “filled” by
colleagues on Skype. It would not be the
same as meeting face to face—and gleaning all the benefits of contingencies
that emerge from personal contact—but it could be a chance to get a piece of
the conference that wasn’t.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.